Guangdong parents reveal children spent 659 yuan on meals during two-day competition, sparking controversy.

Recently, parents of participants in the 2026 Guangdong Outdoor Low-altitude Model Championship have raised concerns to the media about the unreasonable costs associated with the event. According to one parent, it was reported that a child would need to spend 659 Chinese Yuan for meals over two days, which they believed was unjustifiably high due to the pricing structure of the accommodation and meal packages offered during the competition.

As per the information provided by a parent named Ms. Wang, the championship arranged for accommodation at either the Dongguan Meihao Lize Hotel or the Dongguan Chang’an Zhongzheng Wange Hotel, with each room assigned for two participants.

The event offered two meal and accommodation packages:
– Package one: 550 Yuan per person, including one night’s accommodation, 2 light lunch sets, and 1 dinner buffet.
– Package two: 950 Yuan per person, including 2 nights’ accommodation, 3 light lunch sets, and 2 dinner buffets.

The expenses were to be collected by the team coach and remitted to the organizers. Ms. Wang found that the price for a twin room at the same period hotel was 291 Yuan per night, which led her to estimate that a child would spend 659 Yuan on meals over two days, excluding the room charge from the 950 Yuan package.

Additionally, extra expenses such as the shuttle bus fees between Guangzhou and Dongguan, as well as coach escort fees, were also to be borne by the participants, making the total expenses far exceed what was initially expected.

The competition, supervised by the Guangdong Provincial Education Department and organized by the Guangdong Outdoor Sports Association, took place at Chang’an Town Experimental Primary School in Dongguan. The event spanned three days, featuring over twenty different competitive categories catering to students from elementary to high school.

In response to the controversy over the fees, the event organizer’s “Accommodation Contact” personnel stated that the meal and accommodation packages were not mandatory. Families of participants could opt for independent arrangements by booking hotels and planning their own meals, emphasizing that purchasing the packages was not a prerequisite for participation.

The contact person explained that the package prices not only covered room accommodation and meals but also included transportation services between the hotel and the competition venue. It was highlighted that the overall cost was different from simply booking a room online due to the inclusion of various services.

This issue sparked discussions among netizens:
– Some expressed cynicism about the event organizers’ motives to profit off children’s participation.
– Others criticized the rationale behind pre-booking prices being higher than on-site rates.
– Many questioned the notion of the packages being optional when participating families might feel pressured to adhere to the suggested arrangements.
– Some highlighted the financial burdens placed on families to support their children’s participation in activities such as these competitions.

The prevailing sentiment was one of skepticism towards the transparency and fairness of the pricing structure and the necessity of additional fees in the current economic climate where household budgets are already strained.