In a recent analysis by Mark Preston, a commentator from the Cable News Network (CNN), a warning has been issued regarding the potential consequences if former President Trump were to face imprisonment for violating a gag order. Preston suggested that such an event could trigger nationwide unrest and paradoxically aid in Trump’s reelection campaign.
During a segment on “CNN This Morning” that aired on Friday, Mark Preston, along with CNN reporter and anchor Jim Acosta, discussed the possibility of New York Judge Juan Merchan placing Trump in detention for a few hours due to alleged deliberate violations of the gag order issued by the court.
Acosta asked, “But what would be the implications if he is indeed put in detention? Do we really know? I don’t think we do.”
Preston responded, “You know, I believe we don’t really know, but it certainly puts us in a dilemma. Indeed.”
The senior political analyst at CNN pointed out, “I think if he were to be put in confinement, in that situation, first of all, you might see nationwide unrest, albeit in certain cities. That’s the first point.”
“Secondly, from a political standpoint, if I were on Biden’s campaign team, I wouldn’t want to see him jailed because that would only fuel more anger and excitement among the people,” Preston added. “I don’t necessarily think that would be a good thing for the country. Even if we are bending the rules to suit someone’s needs.”
Prior to the discussion led by Preston, on Monday, the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office charged Trump with posting inflammatory remarks on social media about the “gag order case,” seeking penalties against him. Assistant District Attorney Chris Conroy requested a $1000 fine for each of Trump’s posts on social media and warned of the possibility of imprisonment for violating the gag order.
Judge Merchan ruled for a hearing to take place on April 23 to consider the prosecution’s arguments.
On April 1, Judge Merchan issued a ruling expanding the scope of the original gag order, which primarily restricted Trump from publicly commenting on jurors, witnesses, or relatives of lawyers or staff, to also include constraints on Trump’s remarks about the families of the judge and District Attorney Alvin Bragg. The initial gag order did not cover the families of Judge Merchan and Alvin Bragg.
责任编辑：葉紫微#